Onplana vs Microsoft Planner
Microsoft positions Planner Premium as the official Project Online successor. For many PMOs it isn't, the 3,000-task cap, missing critical path, and 10-custom-field limit bite within the first quarter.
Microsoft Planner Premium is the right call if your PMO already runs entirely on M365, your projects fit inside the 3,000-task cap, and you don't need critical path, baselines, or formal stage-gate governance. Onplana is the right call if any of those constraints bite, most enterprise PMOs hit at least one within the first quarter.
For teams committing to AI-first workflows: Onplana ships a public MCP server so Claude Desktop, Gemini CLI, ChatGPT, and Cursor work directly against your projects. Microsoft's strategy for Planner is Copilot-only; no public MCP server as of May 2026.
Feature-by-feature comparison
Sourced from Microsoft's own Planner Premium documentation and Onplana product specs. Where Planner has parity, we mark it.
| Feature | Microsoft Planner Premium Project Online's M365 successor | Onplana Modern & AI-native |
|---|---|---|
| Task limit per plan | 3,000 tasks per plan | Unlimited (50,000+ tested) |
| Custom fields | 10 plain-typed fields | Unlimited typed (text, number, date, picklist, multi-select, formula) |
| Dependency types | Finish-to-Start only | FS, SS, FF, SF + lag/lead |
| Critical path | Not supported | Auto-computed + visualised on Gantt |
| Baselines | Not supported | Saved baselines + variance overlay |
| Resource pool / workload | Per-plan only, no enterprise pool | Org-wide pool + capacity heatmap |
| Portfolio rollups | Not supported | Multi-project portfolios + RAG health |
| Stage-gate governance | Not supported | 12-stage pipeline + gate reviews |
| .mpp / MSPDI native import | No (manual rebuild required) | Native, preserves all four dep types, ECFs, baselines, calendars |
| Desktop app that opens .mpp files | No (Microsoft Project desktop is a separate paid licence) | Onplana Schedule: free Windows and Mac app, opens, edits and reschedules, saves back to Project XML |
| AI integration | Microsoft 365 Copilot (paid add-on) | Claude (Anthropic) + Azure OpenAI, both disclosed, included from PRO |
| Pricing at PMO scale (50 seats) | ~$50/seat/mo for Planner Premium + M365 base | $29/seat/mo ENTERPRISE (no M365 prerequisite) |
| Free tier | Basic Planner only (in M365) | ✓ Free plan with full Gantt + critical path |
| Microsoft 365 SSO | Native | SAML / OIDC (ENTERPRISE) + Microsoft consumer SSO (STARTER) |
| On-prem / self-host option | No | ENTERPRISE_PLUS self-host |
| Result | M365-native, capability-limited | Wins 14/15 |
These gaps in detail
One question each, with the Microsoft position checked and dated.
- How many tasks can a Planner Premium plan hold? Three thousand, which is fewer than Planner Basic allows.
- Does Planner Premium have timesheets? No, and three separate things stop working at once.
- Does Planner Premium have stage gates? No, and Project Online did not either, which matters here.
- Can Planner Premium do resource capacity planning? Inside one plan only, and plans are never summed.
- Does Planner Premium have portfolio management? Yes, and the distinction is worth reading.
- How many custom fields does Planner Premium support? Ten per plan, and the count is not the problem.
- What happens to Project Online reports in Planner Premium? Rebuilt, and the data does survive.
- Does Planner Premium do earned value management? No, and there is no cost model for one to run on.
Past the 3,000-task cap
Formal governance, not just a bigger task list
Planner Premium caps a plan at 3,000 tasks and has no stage gates. This is a twelve-stage proposal pipeline with weighted scoring, multi-reviewer gates with a quorum, and a project created automatically on approval.
When Planner Premium is the right call
- •Your org already runs entirely on M365 and your CIO has standardised on Microsoft's stack as a strategic policy.
- •Your projects fit comfortably under the 3,000-task cap and you don't see that changing in the next 24 months.
- •You don't currently use critical path, baselines, or stage-gate governance, and you don't plan to.
- •You've already paid for Microsoft 365 Copilot and want a single AI surface across Word, Outlook, Teams, and Planner.
When Onplana is the right call
- •Any of your active projects has more than a few hundred tasks, the 3,000 cap will start blocking work sooner than expected.
- •You rely on critical path or baseline tracking for executive reporting.
- •You have an existing portfolio of
.mppfiles that need to migrate without manual rebuild. - •You want choice of AI provider (Claude vs Azure OpenAI) per workload, not one Microsoft-locked default.
- •You need formal stage-gate governance with audit trail (regulated industries, federal PMOs).
- •You want a free starting tier to evaluate before committing seats.
Already on Project Online? You have one decision to make.
Microsoft retires Project Online on September 30, 2026. The two real successors are Planner Premium (constraints above) and Onplana. The migration playbook is identical either way, same 5 steps, same export window, same gate criteria.
Pressure-test the comparison with your own data
Three free tools, no signup. Run them against your real Project Online or.mpp files before you choose.
Inventory Checklist
Discover every project, custom field, and Power Platform integration before you migrate.
Open toolMigration Preview
Upload a .mpp; see exactly what would land in Onplana, task fidelity, deps, baselines.
Open toolMigration Cost Calculator
Estimate full 3-year cost: licenses, parallel running, training, integrations.
Open toolFrequently asked questions
Is Microsoft Planner Premium the same as Project Online?▾
Can Microsoft Planner Premium handle a 5,000-task project?▾
Does Microsoft Planner Premium import .mpp files?▾
How does Onplana compare on cost at 50 seats?▾
What about AI features, Microsoft Copilot vs Onplana?▾
Choose between Planner and Onplana with your own data
Free plan, no credit card. Import a sample .mpp in five minutes, see what your existing schedule actually looks like in each tool.