Opens your existing .mpp files

Why teams switch from
Microsoft Project

Microsoft Project is a good scheduler for one person on one machine. Teams move when the plan has to be worked by several people at once, carry its own hours, or be read from a phone or an AI assistant. This is how the two compare.

Onplana wins 15 of 16 categories

Feature-by-feature comparison

See exactly where Onplana outperforms, and where both tools are on par.

Feature
Microsoft Project
Desktop
Onplana
Modern & AI-native
First project setupEmpty file, manual task entry
AI-generated from one sentence
Pricing (per user)$30.00/user/month on Plan 3, or $679.99 one-time
Free → $29/user/month
AI featuresNone
Claude (Anthropic) & Azure OpenAI, built in (all plans)
Where it runsWindows desktop only
Hosted, or a dedicated deployment in your own Azure subscription (Enterprise+)
Gantt chart✓ (desktop-era UX)
✓ Modern, interactive, web
Real-time collaborationOne editor at a time
✓ Live updates, comments
Timesheets and actualsNeeds Project Server
✓ Costed, with approvals
API accessVBA + local COM
✓ Full REST API + webhooks
Risk detectionManual
✓ AI-powered (BUSINESS+)
Portfolio managementMaster projects
✓ Included from BUSINESS
Proposal / governanceNo
✓ Built-in 12-stage pipeline
Import Microsoft Project plansN/A (it is the source)
✓ .mpp + .mpx + XML + XER + Excel/CSV + field mapper
Open a .mpp without Microsoft ProjectNeeds a Project licence
✓ Free Onplana Schedule app (Windows and Mac)
Mobile-friendlyWindows desktop only
✓ Responsive React SPA
SSO / SAML✓ (M365)
=✓ Enterprise plan and up
Run in your own environmentProject Server, on-premises (costly)
✓ Enterprise+, a dedicated deployment in your own Azure subscription
ResultOne editor, one machine Wins 15/16

Want the longer version: who should switch from Microsoft Project, and who should stay?

Read: why teams switch to Onplana →

Still weighing the field? We keep a list of free alternatives to Microsoft Project that includes tools we do not sell.

Only need to open a .mpp someone sent you? Onplana Schedule opens and edits it for free, with no Microsoft Project licence, and saves your changes as Project XML.

What the migration actually does

Your existing plan, imported and mapped

Every comparison below turns on the same question: what happens to the schedules you already have. This is the wizard doing it, with dependencies, custom fields and baselines mapped before anything is committed.

.mpp, Project XML, XER, Excel and CSV, mapped before you commit.

Compare Onplana side-by-side

Honest, feature-by-feature comparisons against the platforms PMOs evaluate, sourced from public docs, not marketing copy.

Microsoft's own planning tool

Onplana vs Microsoft Planner

The 3,000-task cap, missing critical path, FS-only dependencies, and 10-custom-field limit. Where Planner Premium is the right call, where it isn't.

Read full comparison
Power Platform–tenanted vs standalone SaaS

Onplana vs OnePlan

Two architecturally different bets on PMO tooling. Audience-fit map: when M365-deep is the right call, when decoupled is.

Read full comparison
Flexible work mgmt vs PMO + portfolio

Onplana vs Monday

Monday wins for cross-functional ops/marketing work. Onplana wins on scheduling depth, critical path, baselines, native .mpp import.

Read full comparison
Cross-functional tasks vs PMO scheduling

Onplana vs Asana

Both ship Gantt views, only Onplana runs a real scheduling engine with all four dependency types, baselines, and native .mpp import.

Read full comparison
Collaboration-first vs scheduling-first

Onplana vs Projectplace

Planview does not publish a Projectplace price. Compared on published pricing, free plan, Microsoft Project import, critical path and baselines.

Read full comparison
Spreadsheet-native vs AI-native PM

Onplana vs Smartsheet

Both have enterprise Gantt with critical path. Differences: native .mpp import, dual-provider AI bundled in seat price, free-tier access.

Read full comparison
Disambiguation: dev-issue tracking vs PMO

Onplana vs Plane.so

Both call themselves "AI-native". Different audiences. Plane fits software dev teams; Onplana fits PMOs and portfolio management.

Read full comparison
Everything-app breadth vs PMO scheduling depth

Onplana vs ClickUp

ClickUp packs the widest surface area; Onplana runs a real critical-path engine with baselines and native .mpp import. Where each is the right call.

Read full comparison
Self-host open-source vs AI-native SaaS

Onplana vs OpenProject

OpenProject is the open-source classic for PMO governance. Onplana adds bundled dual-provider AI, native .mpp import, and an MCP agent layer.

Read full comparison

How Onplana compares to other alternatives

Other tools are generic. Onplana was designed specifically for enterprise project management teams.

vs Asana

  • Claude (Anthropic) & Azure OpenAI built in, not a paid add-on
  • Native Gantt + critical path
  • A dedicated deployment in your own Azure subscription (Enterprise+)
  • Native .mpp, .mpx, MS Project XML, Primavera XER and Excel/CSV import built in

vs Monday.com

  • On Enterprise+, a dedicated deployment in your own Azure subscription
  • Transparent per-seat pricing
  • Project-focused UX, not generic work mgmt
  • AI risk detection from day 1

vs ClickUp

  • Focused on PM, less feature bloat
  • Native Earned Value Management
  • Proposal governance pipeline
  • Enterprise SSO + SCIM + audit logs

vs Smartsheet

  • AI-native, Claude (Anthropic) & Azure OpenAI in every workflow
  • A dedicated deployment in your own Azure subscription
  • Full sprint + agile support
  • From $0, not $14/seat minimum

Ready to make the switch?

Start free, no credit card, no seat minimums. Import your first project in minutes.