Onplana vs OpenProject
Both are credible PMO platforms. The choice is managed-service convenience vs open-source autonomy.
OpenProject is the right call for organisations that need open-source freedom, want to self-host without per-seat licensing, and have the ops capacity to maintain the platform themselves. Onplana is the right call for teams that want a managed SaaS option, AI bundled rather than absent, native .mpp binary import (not just XML), and a modern UI on a faster release cadence. Most readers landing here are weighing self-host autonomy against managed-service convenience; both are legitimate trade-offs.
Feature-by-feature comparison
14 dimensions calibrated to PMO buying criteria.
| Feature | OpenProject Open source, self-host first | Onplana SaaS + self-host + AI |
|---|---|---|
| License model | GPL v3 open source (Community) + commercial Cloud | Commercial SaaS + self-host on Enterprise+ |
| Self-host option | ✓ Self-host first (Docker / package install) | ✓ Self-host on Enterprise+ via Docker Compose |
| Per-seat cost (Community) | $0 (self-host the Community Edition) | Free plan up to 5 users; paid from $7/seat |
| Per-seat cost (managed) | ~$7-15/user (Cloud Edition) | $7 Starter, $12 PRO, $20 Business, $29 Enterprise |
| Critical path computation | Manual workaround via Gantt views | Auto-computed CPM with forward + backward pass |
| Dependency types | FS, SS, FF, SF (all four) | FS, SS, FF, SF + lag/lead in days/hours/percent |
| Saved baselines | Baseline comparison (Enterprise Edition) | Multiple baselines, Gantt shadow overlay (every plan) |
| Native .mpp / MSPDI import | MSPDI XML only (no binary .mpp parser) | Direct .mpp binary + MSPDI XML + Project Online OData |
| Desktop app that opens .mpp files | Not offered | Onplana Schedule: free Windows and Mac app, opens, edits and reschedules, saves back to Project XML |
| AI features | Not built in | Plan generation + status reports on every plan; risk detection Business+ |
| Resource pool / capacity | ✓ Resource module | Org-wide pool + heatmap + 4-week forecast |
| Stage-gate governance | Custom workflows + statuses | 12-stage pipeline + multi-reviewer gates + audit |
| Audit log retention | ✓ Audit module (Enterprise Edition) | ✓ Configurable retention policy + per-org SCIM |
| Mobile experience | Web-responsive (no native mobile app) | Web-responsive (native mobile on roadmap) |
| Modern UI / iteration pace | Mature, slower iteration cycle | Modern React UI, weekly release cadence |
| Result | Strong open-source PMO platform | Wins 7/15 on managed-service + AI criteria |
The layer OpenProject does not ship
AI that reads the schedule you already have
OpenProject ships no native AI. Onplana bundles the suite into the seat price on every plan including Free: chat with project context, plan generation, status reports and natural-language parsing. Risk analysis like the screen below is the deeper tier and starts on Business.
When OpenProject fits
- •Open-source freedom matters: you want to audit code, fork if needed, no vendor-lock-in.
- •You have ops capacity to self-host (upgrades, backups, security patches) and want zero per-seat cost.
- •You don't need AI features as part of the platform.
- •Your .mpp source files can be re-saved as MSPDI XML before import.
When Onplana fits
- •You want managed SaaS as the default, with the option to self-host later (Enterprise+).
- •You want AI bundled into the platform: risk detection, plan generation, status reports.
- •You're migrating
.mppbinary files at scale and don't want a Project Desktop conversion step. - •You value a modern UI on a faster release cadence over deeper open-source customisation.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenProject really free?▾
Can OpenProject import Microsoft Project files?▾
Does OpenProject have AI features?▾
Where does OpenProject clearly win?▾
Where does Onplana clearly win?▾
Can I run Onplana on my own infrastructure like OpenProject?▾
Try Onplana with a real schedule
Free plan, no credit card. Self-host on Enterprise+.