Onplana vs Microsoft Project Online: Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Onplana vs Microsoft Project Online across scheduling, governance, AI, integrations, and pricing. Project Online retired on September 30, 2026.
Microsoft Project Online retired on September 30, 2026, the third of three Microsoft retirements in the same six-month window. If you ran PWA, the question for a new tool is whether it covers everything your PMO actually used: the Gantt schedules with FS/SS/FF/SF dependencies, the enterprise custom fields, the resource pool with cost rate tables, the governance gates, the CCB workflow, the audit trail, the SSO. Pick wrong and migration day finds the gap.
This post is the direct head-to-head: Onplana vs Project Online, feature by feature, with the parity status, the gaps that matter, and the gaps that don't. If you're earlier in the decision process, the Project Online retirement timeline covers what changed, and Best Microsoft Project Alternatives in 2026 is the wider market scan.
SKU-level context: the Project Online SKU landscape for 2026 covers Plan 1, Plan 3, and Plan 5 against the rest of the Microsoft Project tier set.
TL;DR: At a glance
- Schedule fidelity: parity. Same dependencies, same baselines, same critical path, with a faster Gantt.
- Resource pool + governance: parity. ECFs, lookup tables, cost rate cards, multi-reviewer gates, CCB.
- AI: Onplana has it. Project Online does not.
- Modern UX: real-time collaboration, mobile, dark mode, unified workspace. Project Online is 2014-era SharePoint UX.
- Microsoft 365 integration: Onplana imports Planner and Project for the Web; bi-directionally syncs with To Do per project list. Project Online itself was retired, and anything that read it live stopped with it.
- Pricing: ~47% cheaper at the BUSINESS tier vs Plan 3. Free tier exists.
- Migration: native .mpp and Project XML import. Most PMOs land in 8-12 weeks.
Schedule planning + Gantt: feature parity, modern execution
For most PMOs evaluating a Project Online replacement, this is the make-or-break category. If schedules don't move 1:1, the migration is dead in the water.
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Gantt chart with hierarchical tasks | Yes | Yes |
| All 4 dependency types (FS / SS / FF / SF) | Yes | Yes |
| Dependency lag values | Yes | Yes |
| Critical path calculation | Yes | Yes |
| Multiple baselines per project | Yes (up to 11) | Yes (unlimited; named snapshots) |
| Baseline overlay on Gantt | Yes | Yes |
| Milestone markers | Yes (diamonds) | Yes (diamonds) |
| Auto-schedule from constraints | Yes | Yes |
| Resource leveling | Yes | Yes (with preview before apply) |
| Calendar exceptions per resource | Yes | Yes |
| Date-only fields (no TZ shifts) | Yes | Yes (UTC-pinned per CLAUDE.md note 71) |
| Working calendars with templates | Yes | Yes (Mon-Fri / Mon-Sat / 7-day + custom) |
Where Onplana edges ahead: drag-to-reorder Kanban, Calendar, and Burndown views all share the same task model, so a task moved on Kanban updates the Gantt instantly. Project Online's view-switching requires save-publish round-trips. Onplana's Gantt also renders the baseline as a phantom row INSIDE the Gantt (not as a separate "compare" mode), so drift is visible without a mode switch.
Where Project Online edges ahead: the Project Desktop client has decades of muscle memory for power users doing complex schedule edits. Onplana's web-only Gantt is faster but unfamiliar to Desktop diehards for the first week.
Custom fields + lookup tables: full parity, no silent loss
The single most common gap in Project Online replacements is custom-field fidelity. Onplana matches the three-axis attachment model (Project / Task / Resource) and supports hierarchical lookup tables natively.
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Project-level enterprise custom fields | Yes | Yes (CustomFieldDefinition entityType=PROJECT) |
| Task-level enterprise custom fields | Yes | Yes (entityType=TASK) |
| Resource-level enterprise custom fields | Yes | Mapped to user profile fields |
| Field types (text, number, cost, date, flag, lookup) | 6 types | 7 types (TEXT, NUMBER, COST, DATE, CHECKBOX, DROPDOWN, MULTI_SELECT) |
| Multi-line text fields | Yes | Yes (TEXT_LONG) |
| Required-field enforcement | Yes | Yes |
| Lookup tables (flat) | Yes | Yes (DROPDOWN / MULTI_SELECT) |
| Lookup tables (hierarchical, parent-child) | Yes | Yes (Tag tree with parent/child) |
| Calculated fields | Yes (Project formula language) | Snapshot value migrates; formula recreates in destination expression engine if needed |
| Multi-value lookup auto-split (";#" delimiter) | N/A | Yes (importer handles natively) |
| Currency-typed cost fields | Yes (org-default currency) | Yes (per-field currency lock; survives multi-currency rollups) |
The full migration path is in Project Online Custom Fields Migration, including the audit-on-the-source-side pass that typically retires 40-60% of dead-weight fields before migration even starts.
Resource pool + capacity: full parity with cleaner UX
Project Online's Enterprise Resource Pool, cost-rate tables, and per-resource availability all have direct equivalents in Onplana.
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Tenant-wide resource pool (one resource, many projects) | Yes | Yes (organization members) |
| Generic resources (role placeholders) | Yes | Yes (project roles + role-keyed rate cards) |
| Material + cost resources | Yes (Material, Cost types) | Modeled separately as expense categories / budget lines |
| Cost rate tables A through E | Yes | Table A maps directly; B-E supported via labeled rate cards |
| Date-tiered rates (effective from / to) | Yes | Yes (RateCard with effectiveFrom + effectiveTo) |
| Per-resource availability calendars | Yes | Yes (WorkingCalendar with per-user assignment) |
| Per-resource calendar exceptions (vacation, sick) | Yes | Yes (CalendarException model) |
| Capacity planning (weekly hours per resource) | Yes | Yes (ResourceCapacity model + Capacity Planner UI) |
| Cross-project workload visibility | Yes | Yes (Resources page + over-allocation detection) |
| Timesheets with approval workflow | Yes | Yes (per-week submit, manager or designated-approver mode) |
| Historical timesheet retention | Yes | Yes (with FX-snapshot per-entry for stable historical reports) |
Where the Enterprise Resource Pool lands, and how the replacements score on resource management, is in Project Online Alternative Resource Management, Scored.
Governance + CCB: first-class on both, modern execution on Onplana
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-stage proposal workflow | Yes (custom EPT) | Yes (12 stages, ENTERPRISE+) |
| Multi-reviewer gate approvals | Yes (workflow approval) | Yes (designated reviewers per gate, quorum logic) |
| Gate reviewer panels (per gate type) | Yes | Yes (PROPOSAL_REVIEW / BUSINESS_CASE_REVIEW / PLAN_REVIEW) |
| Project auto-creation from approved proposal | Yes | Yes (configurable: at approval, at business case, at plan) |
| Change Control Board (CCB) | Custom build via SharePoint | First-class feature (ENTERPRISE+) |
| Formal change request workflow | Custom build | Yes (DRAFT → SUBMITTED → REVIEWED → APPROVED / REJECTED → IMPLEMENTED) |
| Designated CR reviewers | Custom build | Yes (ChangeRequestReviewer + threshold) |
| Audit trail per gate decision | Yes | Yes (ProposalReview + AuditLog) |
| Sponsor notifications | Custom build | Yes (built-in on every stage transition) |
| Project↔Proposal lifecycle bridge | Manual | Auto-sync (status changes propagate both ways) |
Verdict: where Project Online required custom SharePoint workflow + Power Automate to build CCB, Onplana ships it as a first-class feature with the audit trail and notifications already wired.
AI: Onplana has it; Project Online does not
This is the single largest gap. The dedicated Onplana vs Project Online AI walkthrough covers the seven AI surfaces (plan generation, risk detection, status summaries, NL parsing, portfolio Q&A, recommendations, AI Chat) with the per-surface delta between the two platforms.
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| AI plan generation (idea → tasks/subtasks/risks) | None | Yes (every plan, including Free) |
| AI risk detection (analyses tasks, timeline, team) | None | Yes (PRO+) |
| Natural-language task parsing ("schedule design review next Tuesday") | None | Yes |
| AI status report generation | None | Yes |
| AI Project Kickstart (first-run onboarding) | None | Yes |
| Per-org AI cost ledger + admin caps | N/A | Yes |
| Dual-provider (Anthropic + Azure OpenAI), Onplana-managed | N/A | Yes |
| Automatic AI provider failover | N/A | Yes |
Project Online predates Microsoft Copilot, and Microsoft has explicitly not added Copilot to Project Online (the investment has gone to Project for the Web). For PMOs evaluating tools by AI capability, this is a one-sided comparison.
Modern Microsoft 365 integration: Onplana imports from all three
Project Online itself was retired. The integration story for organizations staying on Microsoft 365 is now Project for the Web (Premium), Microsoft Planner (consolidated app inside Teams), and Microsoft To Do. Onplana imports from all three.
| Integration | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Planner import | N/A (different product) | Yes (Microsoft Graph, basic-tier with optional live sync) |
| Project for the Web (Premium) import | N/A (different product) | Yes (Dataverse path; brings dependencies + effort) |
| Microsoft To Do bi-directional sync | N/A (different product) | Yes (per-project lists + subtasks as checklist items) |
| Microsoft Teams notification cards | Limited | Yes (project.* and task.* events) |
| Microsoft Outlook calendar push | Limited (Project Server-side) | Yes (event sync per task with due date) |
| Microsoft Graph token refresh + revocation | N/A | Yes (built-in via OAuthConnection model) |
The Microsoft 365 imports are documented in:
- How to Migrate Microsoft Planner to Onplana
- How to Import Microsoft Project for the Web (Premium)
- Microsoft To Do Sync With Onplana
Real-time collaboration + modern UX
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time updates (WebSocket) | No (page refresh) | Yes (Socket.IO across project pages) |
| Multi-user concurrent editing | Server check-out / check-in | Yes (per-row optimistic locking) |
| Native mobile experience | Limited (responsive PWA pages) | Yes (mobile-first responsive) |
| Dark mode | No | Yes |
| Drag-and-drop Kanban | No (PWA does not have Kanban) | Yes |
| Calendar view | Yes | Yes |
| Burndown view | Limited (Power BI add-on) | Built-in (sprint + project scope) |
| Keyboard shortcuts | Some | Yes (G+T → /people, J/K navigation, etc.) |
| Global search | Limited (SharePoint search) | Yes (cross-project, cross-entity) |
Workspace + knowledge
Project Online relied on the underlying SharePoint Project Site for documents, wikis, and links. Onplana brings these in-product.
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Document libraries (per project) | Yes (SharePoint) | Yes (PRO+, 100MB upload limit) |
| Spreadsheet-style tables (per project) | No (use Excel) | Yes (PRO+) |
| Whiteboards (collaborative) | No | Yes (Excalidraw, real-time, PRO+) |
| Wiki pages (with rich text) | Yes (SharePoint Wiki) | Yes (BlockNote with Y.js live collaboration, PRO+) |
| External link board (Miro / Figma / Notion / etc.) | Manual | Yes (paste-a-URL workflow) |
| Project mailbox (inbound email → tasks) | No | Yes (per-project email address) |
Reporting + dashboards
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| OData feed for external reporting | Yes (/_api/ProjectData) |
Yes (REST API + OpenAPI docs) |
| Power BI integration | Yes (deprecated with PWA retirement) | Yes (Power Query path against Onplana export API) |
| Cross-project dashboards | Limited (PWA pages) | Yes (Custom Dashboard Builder, 18 widgets, PRO+) |
| Role-based dashboard templates | Manual | Yes (ENTERPRISE+) |
| EVM tracking (BAC / PV / EV / AC / CPI / SPI / EAC) | Yes | Yes (with FX-snapshot historical accuracy) |
| Composite Project Score | No | Yes (Governance + Schedule + Goals + Tasks weighted average) |
| Shareable public report links | Yes (SharePoint sharing) | Yes (signed token + optional password + expiry) |
| Cross-project reports | Yes | Yes (every plan, including Free; currency-normalized rollups) |
Security + compliance
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| SSO (SAML + OIDC) | Yes (via Microsoft 365) | Yes (ENTERPRISE+, plus Google + Microsoft built-in for everyone) |
| SCIM provisioning | Yes (via Microsoft 365) | Yes (ENTERPRISE+) |
| 2FA / MFA enforcement | Yes (via Microsoft 365) | Yes (TOTP + QR + backup codes, org-wide enforcement) |
| Per-org session policies (idle timeout) | Limited | Yes (configurable per-org, idle timeout + max sessions) |
| Live session registry (review/revoke devices) | Limited | Yes (Settings → Security) |
| IP allowlist | Yes (via Conditional Access) | Yes (ENTERPRISE+) |
| Audit logs | Yes | Yes (ENTERPRISE+, with grouped views and export) |
| API tokens (PATs) | Limited (app passwords) | Yes (with scopes + revocation) |
| Encryption key control | Available via Azure | In a dedicated deployment (Enterprise+), the encryption keys live in your own Azure subscription |
| GDPR right-to-be-forgotten | Available via Microsoft 365 | Built-in (anonymize-in-place flow) |
Forms + intake
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Public intake forms | Yes (via SharePoint Forms / InfoPath, deprecated) | Yes (PRO+) |
| Custom fields on intake forms | Yes | Yes |
| Password protection on forms | Manual | Built-in (bcrypt-hashed) |
| Auto-create tasks/projects on submission | Custom workflow | Built-in |
| Multi-recipient notify (users + teams) | Custom | Built-in |
Workflow automation
Project Online relied on SharePoint Designer 2013 workflows + Power Automate for any automation. SharePoint 2013 workflows are formally deprecated. Onplana ships its own automation engine. For builders comparing the wider extensibility surface (REST API, webhooks, PATs, MCP), the Onplana vs Project Online extensibility comparison covers what each platform actually lets you build against, beyond just workflow rules.
| Capability | Project Online | Onplana |
|---|---|---|
| Triggers on task / project events | SharePoint workflow | Yes (TASK_CREATED, STATUS_CHANGED, PROJECT_STATUS_CHANGED, CR_*, etc.) |
| Conditional branching | Yes | Yes |
| Action steps (notify, set field, webhook, approval) | Yes (Power Automate) | Yes (PRO+, all five plus delays) |
| Multi-step approval flows | Power Automate | Built-in |
| Run history + audit | Power Automate | Built-in |
| Webhooks (HMAC-signed) | Power Automate | Built-in (10 event types, BUSINESS+) |
Pricing comparison
The Onplana vs Project Online pricing comparison breaks the per-plan deltas down with 1, 3, and 5-year TCO across team sizes; the summary chart below is the 50-seat 3-year case.
| Plan | Project Online (at retirement) | Onplana (annual billing) |
|---|---|---|
| Entry | Project Plan 1: $10/seat/mo (project view only) | FREE (full PM features, 2 projects) |
| Standard | Project Plan 3 (formerly Project Online Professional): $30/seat/mo | PRO: $10/seat/mo (sprints, resource capacity, time tracking, custom fields, advanced AI) |
| Enterprise | Project Plan 5 (formerly Project Online Premium): $55/seat/mo | BUSINESS: $16/seat/mo (portfolios, integrations, custom roles) |
| Premium tier | N/A | ENTERPRISE: $23/seat/mo (governance, SSO, SCIM, audit) |
| Free guest seats | None | 2 (PRO), 5 (BUSINESS), 10 (ENTERPRISE+) |
| Free trial | 30 days, card required | FREE plan, no card required |
For a budget-grade comparison see Cost of Migrating from MS Project Online in 2026, and for the CFO-grade build-up see The CFO-Proof Project Online Business Case.
Migration path: how it actually works
The Onplana vs Project Online deployment comparison covers how each platform is hosted, including Onplana's dedicated deployment in your own Azure subscription; this section focuses on the data-import mechanics for moving an existing tenant.
Onplana imports the files you exported from Project Online.
| Source | Method | What gets imported |
|---|---|---|
.mpp, .mpx and Project XML files (one per project) |
Drag-and-drop, in-process MPXJ parser for binaries, native parser for .xml (MSPDI) |
Tasks + dependencies (FS/SS/FF/SF + lag) + custom fields + resources + costs, and the file's baseline as a baseline in a new project |
Imported into a new project, a .mpp or Project XML file's baseline 0 comes across as a baseline in Onplana. Working calendars do not: the project uses the organization's working calendar.
The full step-by-step is in How to Migrate from Microsoft Project Online. For the two technical sub-systems that drive most migration labor, see Project Online Custom Fields Migration and Project Online Alternative Resource Management, Scored.
Two free no-signup tools to derisk the migration before committing:
- Migration Preview: upload any .mpp and get a feature-by-feature compatibility report so the labor estimate stops being a guess.
- Migration Cost Calculator: 3-year TCO with low / mid / high scenarios, downloadable PDF for the CFO.
When NOT to pick Onplana
Honesty matters. Three cases where Microsoft's successors to Project Online might fit better than Onplana:
You're already deep into Microsoft Power Platform for everything: Power BI dashboards driving executive meetings, Power Apps front-ends on top of Dataverse, Power Automate flows orchestrating everything. Project for the Web (Premium) inside the same Dataverse instance keeps the data model unified. Onplana imports from P4W if you decide to consolidate later, but if Power Platform IS your platform, Microsoft's stack is the natural choice.
You're a SharePoint-heavy organization that used PWA Project Sites as the primary collaboration surface for non-PMs (engineers reading specs, finance pulling cost reports). Onplana brings documents and wikis in-product, but if your wider company-wide knowledge base lives on SharePoint, the integration cost may not justify the move for that audience.
You're running scheduling at a scale Microsoft Project Desktop is uniquely built for: 5,000+ task schedules with complex resource leveling, manual constraint management by trained schedulers. Onplana handles this scale and the scheduling math is identical, but the muscle memory difference matters. For these orgs, the right setup is Onplana for the cloud surface plus Project Desktop for the heavy-lifting schedulers (which Microsoft is keeping alive).
For the wider market scan see Best Microsoft Project Alternatives in 2026, and for an even broader read across categories beyond direct MS Project replacements, 10 project management tools compared across scheduling, AI, governance, pricing, and team fit puts Onplana on the same scoring grid as Asana, Monday, Jira, Smartsheet, ClickUp, Linear, Notion, and Wrike. For the Microsoft 365 staying-with-Microsoft path see Microsoft Project Online vs Microsoft Planner.
Decision matrix
| If your priority is | Pick |
|---|---|
| Schedule fidelity + dependency-driven Gantt + baselines | Onplana (parity + faster) or Project Desktop |
| Enterprise governance with multi-reviewer gates + CCB | Onplana (built-in) or custom Power Platform on P4W |
| AI assistance (plan-gen, risks, NL parsing) | Onplana |
| Free tier to derisk evaluation | Onplana |
| Lowest 3-year license cost | Onplana |
| Already deep in Power Platform | Project for the Web Premium |
| Lightweight task lists for non-PM teams | Microsoft Planner |
| Heavy SharePoint dependency for wider org | Project for the Web + SharePoint |
| Importing Microsoft Project files and Project Online exports | Onplana (native .mpp and Project XML import) |
Get started
Start your free migration →: drag in a .mpp or Project XML file, or pick a Microsoft 365 surface to import from.
Where to go deeper
- the Project Online retirement timeline
- How to Migrate from Microsoft Project Online: Step-by-Step
- Project Online Custom Fields Migration
- Project Online Alternative Resource Management, Scored
- Project Online Migration Checklist 2026
- Cost of Migrating from MS Project Online in 2026
- The CFO-Proof Project Online Business Case
- MS Project (Desktop) vs Onplana: sibling comparison for the Desktop side
- Best Microsoft Project Alternatives in 2026: wider market scan
- Microsoft Project Online vs Microsoft Planner: staying-on-Microsoft option
Want to see Onplana running with your real Project Online data before you decide? Start free, drag in one .mpp, and see how it lands. Or run Migration Preview on the same file first to know which features cross the tool boundary cleanly.
Microsoft Project Online™ is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Onplana is not affiliated with Microsoft.
Frequently asked questions
Does Onplana cover what Project Online did, or is it lighter-weight?
It covers the Project Online features most PMOs actually used: dependency-driven Gantt with all four dependency types (FS / SS / FF / SF) and lag, baselines with overlay rendering, critical-path computation, enterprise custom fields, hierarchical lookup tables, an enterprise-style resource pool with cost rate cards and per-resource calendars, formal governance gates with multi-reviewer quorum, change-control board (CCB) workflows, EVM tracking with FX-snapshot historical accuracy, audit logs, SSO + SCIM, and IP allowlists. The lighter-weight comparison is Microsoft Planner; for that side-by-side see Microsoft Project Online vs Microsoft Planner.
What does Onplana have that Project Online doesn't?
Three things matter most. First, AI: built-in plan generation, risk detection, NL task parsing, status-report generation, and an AI Project Kickstart that turns a one-paragraph project brief into a full task tree with subtasks and risks. Project Online has no AI. Second, modern UX: real-time collaboration via WebSocket, drag-and-drop Kanban, native mobile, dark mode, and a unified workspace covering documents, whiteboards (Excalidraw), and wikis (BlockNote). Project Online's UX is largely unchanged since 2014. Third, modern Microsoft 365 integration: Onplana imports from Project for the Web (Premium) and Microsoft Planner, and bi-directionally syncs with Microsoft To Do at the per-project list level with subtasks-as-checklist-items. Project Online itself was retired; the modern Microsoft surfaces don't talk to it.
How does pricing compare?
Project Online ran on Microsoft Project Plan 3 ($30 per user per month) and Plan 5 ($55 per user per month). Onplana's plan tiers run from FREE to Enterprise+, with the Gantt chart and critical path on every tier including FREE, PRO at $12 / user / month (which adds sprints, custom fields, automations, time tracking, resource capacity planning, and advanced AI), BUSINESS at $20 / user / month (adds portfolios, goals, webhooks, integrations, and custom roles), and ENTERPRISE at $29 / user / month (adds governance, SSO, SCIM, audit logs, IP allowlist, project classification, change control, and scenario planning). Annual billing is 20% off. For a 50-seat PMO that paid $30/seat × 50 × 36 months on Project Online ($54,000 / 3 years), the same shape on Onplana BUSINESS annual ($16/seat) is $28,800 / 3 years, about 47% less on license alone. The migration cost calculator at /tools/migration-cost-calculator computes the full picture including labor and integration rework.
What about the .mpp files and OData reports we already have?
Both migrate. Onplana has a built-in .mpp parser that reads tasks, dependencies (all four types with lag), custom fields, and resources directly. Costs come across, and a .mpp or Project XML file imported into a new project brings its baseline as a baseline in Onplana. For OData-based Power BI reports, Onplana exposes its own export API plus a Power BI / Power Query path; reports that read /Projects, /Tasks, /Resources, and /Assignments map cleanly. The exact mapping is in How to Migrate from Microsoft Project Online (full step-by-step), Project Online Custom Fields Migration (for ECFs and lookup tables specifically), and Project Online Resource Pool Migration (for the Enterprise Resource Pool, cost rate tables, and calendars).
Can teams migrate gradually, or does it have to be a hard cut-over?
Gradual is supported and is what most mid-to-large PMOs do. Project Online retired on September 30, 2026, so a gradual move now means bringing in what you exported in waves, and Onplana's permission model and project-level isolation let each team move on its own schedule. The recommended pattern is: pilot one project end-to-end, then move by program or department in 5-10 project waves, validating each cohort against its exported files before it cuts over. Detailed in How to Migrate from Microsoft Project Online.
What happens to our governance workflows and CCB?
Both surfaces are first-class in Onplana. The 12-stage proposal workflow (DRAFT through COMPLETED / REJECTED with explicit gate reviews at PROPOSAL_REVIEW, BUSINESS_CASE_REVIEW, and PLAN_REVIEW) replaces the Project Online governance flow with a cleaner UX and proper multi-reviewer quorum (any single rejection rejects, all approvals advance, otherwise stays pending). Change Control Board (CCB) is a separate first-class feature with its own change-request workflow, designated reviewers, and approval threshold. Both are gated to the ENTERPRISE plan.
Is there a free way to try the migration before we commit?
Yes. Three free no-signup tools: Schedule Health Check (upload any .mpp, get a 7-analyzer health score before you migrate), Migration Preview (same upload, feature-by-feature compatibility report against Onplana so the labor estimate stops being a guess), and the Migration Cost Calculator (3-year TCO with low / mid / high scenarios for the CFO). On top of that, Onplana's FREE plan (no card required) lets you actually run an end-to-end migration on a small project, validate the output, and only upgrade once you've seen the data land cleanly.
Ready to make the switch?
Start your free Onplana account and import your existing projects in minutes.