Onplana vs Kantata: Published Price vs Custom Quote
Onplana vs Kantata: Kantata is quote-only and strongest in services resource utilization and revenue recognition. Here's where each is the right pick.
Kantata earns its spot on professional-services shortlists for a real reason: the platform, built from the 2022 merger of Mavenlink and Kimble Applications, is built around the specific economics a services firm runs on, utilization, billable rates, and revenue recognition, and that reputation is exactly why teams outside that narrow shape end up evaluating it anyway.
The direct answer: Onplana vs Kantata comes down to whether your team's bottleneck is deep services financials at scale, or rate-card and multi-currency depth on a published price you can see before a sales call. Kantata is a quote-only platform built for professional services organizations, with strong utilization analytics, skills-based staffing, and a revenue-recognition module in its higher tiers. Onplana publishes every price, includes rate cards across three scopes and 20-currency budgets on every plan including Free, and adds resource capacity planning and timesheet cost calculations on Pro, all reachable without a demo request.
Kantata publishes no pricing; every path is a sales conversation, and the platform's real strength, utilization analytics and revenue recognition for services organizations at scale, is exactly the depth that makes it slower to stand up. Onplana runs Free through $29-per-seat Enterprise, all published, with rate cards, multi-currency budgets, a Gantt and critical path on every plan, plus resource capacity planning and timesheet cost calculations on Pro. Pick Kantata when services-scale utilization and revenue recognition is the actual, current bottleneck. Pick Onplana when you want real scheduling and rate-card depth working today, at a price you know in advance.
What Kantata Actually Is
Kantata positions itself as purpose-built technology for professional services organizations, formed when Mavenlink and Kimble Applications merged and relaunched under the Kantata name in May 2022. The platform's core pitch is services economics: matching the right resource to the right engagement, tracking utilization and bench time across a shared resource pool, and running the billing and revenue-recognition math a services firm's finance team needs. None of that is priced on Kantata's own site; the company's pricing page states plans are "tailored based on your company size, goals, and the way your team works" and every path leads to filling out a form for a sales conversation.
Onplana vs Kantata: Compared on 8 Dimensions
| Dimension | Onplana | Kantata |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Published: Free / $7 / $12 / $20 / $29 per seat, 20% off annual | Not published; tailored quote after a sales conversation |
| Free tier | Yes: 5 members, 2 projects, Gantt + critical path included | None; evaluated through a demo |
| Rate cards | Per-user, role-based, and org-default hourly rates, every plan including Free | Included; depth and configuration set during a quoted deployment |
| Multi-currency budgets | 20 currencies, org-level exchange rates, every plan including Free | Included as part of the financials module |
| Resource capacity planning | Per-person capacity vs allocation, billable vs total hours (Pro and up) | Utilization analytics and bench visibility, a documented core strength |
| Revenue recognition | Not built as a dedicated module | Dedicated financial-consolidation and revenue-recognition tooling in higher tiers |
| Timesheets & cost calculations | Logged hours, approval chain, cost math (Pro and up) | Included as part of the financials and billing suite |
| Time to first real project | Minutes, self-serve signup | Typically weeks, sales and configuration led |
The diagram below shows the same split as the table: two products built for different scales of services financial depth, one reached through a self-serve signup, one through a scoped deployment.
Where Kantata Genuinely Wins
Services-scale financial depth is the honest edge case. A professional services firm running many concurrent client engagements against a shared consultant pool, with a finance team that needs formal revenue recognition and financial consolidation across those engagements, needs tooling built specifically for that math, and Kantata's financials module is purpose-built for exactly that. Onplana's rate cards cover per-user, role-based, and org-default hourly billing with multi-currency support on every plan, but a dedicated revenue-recognition and consolidation layer, the kind a services firm's controller signs off on, is not something Onplana builds today. A firm whose actual bottleneck is that financial depth has a real reason to put Kantata on the shortlist that has nothing to do with brand inertia.
Where the Quote-Only Model Costs You Time
The bigger practical difference shows up before either platform gets judged on features at all. Reaching a configured Kantata deployment typically means a sales conversation followed by setup work scoped to the firm's engagement types and resource pool, sized appropriately for the services depth it's built to deliver but slow by the standard of a team that wants to see rate cards and a schedule running against a real project this week. Onplana's free tier ships rate cards, multi-currency budgets, dependency scheduling, and a critical path with no configuration step, and resource capacity planning lands on Pro without a sales quote, so a team can validate billing math and scheduling depth before any implementation budget gets discussed. Managing multi-currency project budgets covers the currency and exchange-rate side of that in more depth if a global client roster is part of the evaluation.
Which One Wins
Kantata wins for: professional services organizations running many concurrent engagements through a shared resource pool, with a finance team that needs formal revenue recognition and consolidation, and budgets already sized for a sales-led enterprise deployment.
Onplana wins for: consulting and services teams that want to see real rate-card and multi-currency depth, dependency scheduling, and a critical path, before committing to anything, and teams outside large-firm services finance that want billing math at a published price with no configuration project required to find out if it fits. Onplana vs Adobe Workfront covers the closest adjacent quote-only comparison if request-driven creative operations is also on your list. The compare hub has side-by-side pages for the tools most commonly shortlisted alongside professional services platforms.
Frequently asked questions
What's the main difference between Onplana and Kantata?
Kantata is a quote-only professional services automation platform built around services revenue: utilization analytics, skills-based staffing, and revenue recognition, reached through a sales conversation with no published pricing. Onplana publishes every price, includes rate cards and multi-currency budgets on every plan including Free, and adds resource capacity planning and cost calculations on Pro without a quote required to see them.
Does Kantata publish its pricing?
No. Kantata's own pricing page states plans are tailored per company and directs every visitor to fill out a form for a sales conversation. No per-seat number, tier name, or feature-to-price mapping is published anywhere on its site.
Does Onplana have rate cards like Kantata does?
Yes, and on every plan including Free: per-user, role-based, and org-default hourly rates with multi-currency support and overlap validation. Kantata's deepest financial tooling, including revenue recognition, sits in its higher tiers, reached only after a quoted deployment.
Is Kantata overkill for a small consulting team?
Often, yes. Kantata's utilization analytics and bench-visibility depth is built for a services organization running many concurrent engagements against a shared resource pool, which is real strength a team of a handful of consultants usually doesn't need yet, and still requires a sales-quoted deployment to access at all.
Does Onplana handle revenue recognition the way Kantata's financials module does?
Not to the same depth. Onplana's multi-currency budgets and rate cards cover project-level cost and billing math on every plan, but a dedicated revenue-recognition and financial-consolidation module, the kind Kantata's higher tiers ship for services firms with formal recognition requirements, is not something Onplana builds today.
Which one is faster to get running?
Onplana's free tier is self-serve: create an account and rate cards, multi-currency budgets, a Gantt, and a critical path are there in minutes. Kantata is reached through a sales conversation and a configuration pass sized to the firm's engagement types and resource pool, which is real setup time before a single project runs through it.
Ready to make the switch?
Start your free Onplana account and import your existing projects in minutes.